The Relationship between Globalisation and Migration
Need help with my writing homework on Relationship between Globalisation and Migration. Write a 3000 word paper answering; In contrast to historic migrations, figures of migration in the current globalized world are way greater than any era. With the emergence of new global culture, mass media liberalized trade, and financial corporations. it has been in conflict with barriers to migration which restrict free mobility and the right to migrate. In this third wave of globalization and postmodernism where international migration is restricted against all its cultural and political norms. This expulsion of human mobility from the globalization definition leaves it as a narrow concept of expansion where it’s ethical, economic, and political existence comes in conflict with sustainability. Besides all aspects of globalization, this barrier to international human mobility also comes under violation of international law where freedom to move freely is under attack. This asymmetrical nature of globalization defines the exploitation of this term being used for interests of certain groups that have been promoting the free exchange of goods by liberalizing economies and diminishing barriers to free mobility of goods yet are keen to impose restrictions on migration. Barriers can be justified by the number of migrations, in all past era migration figures were way smaller than the total population but the first wave of globalization registered the massive migration of around 3%. If we examine this movement of people, it has certain patterns where people from all around the world have migrated to either Europe or America while these migrations have been supported by some international agreement permitting movement of laborers (GEDDES, 2011). Irrespective of these agreements, there have been many incidents of illegal migration where besides restrictions and barriers migrants have successfully crossed borders and have been living in disguise. It resembles the inconsistency and incompatibility of such asymmetric policies which at one hand support growth of liberalization while on the other hand attempt to contain it. .  .
