Pseudo Transformational Leader

In at least one paragraph, supported by evidence from your text, articles, and other research, respond to the bullet points below: Define the terms authentic and pseudo-transformational leader. Pick two leaders, one authentic and one pseudo-transformational. Explain why the chosen leaders fit the assigned leadership style. Describe the leaders’ activities that made them either an authentic or pseudo-transformational leader. 2nd This discussion forum focuses on analyzing Case Study 8.1 (A New Mission for Ferryport College) from your textbook. In at least one paragraph, supported by evidence from your text and from other research, respond to at least three of the seven bullet points below: Describe if Hughes is a transformational or pseudo-transformational leader. Was it ethical to downplay the college’s mission in order to attract more students? Explain if colleges operate more like businesses. By recruiting business donors, did Hughes sell out the vision and values of the school? Should Ferryport change its vision statement? Why or why not? Is there any way to ensure Ferryport’s financial future without further altering its culture? If so, how? If you were a faculty member, would you support a no-confidence vote? If you were on the board of trustees, how would you respond to such a vote? “Case Study 8.1: A New Mission for Ferryport College Ferryport College was founded by a group of abolitionists prior to the Civil War. The group wanted to train teachers, clergy, and other professionals for the fight against slavery. After slavery was abolished, Ferryport continued to emphasize social justice, supporting, for example, the early union movement, the Civil Rights Movement, equal opportunities for women, fair trade, and antipoverty initiatives. Social concern is written into the college’s mission statement, which states, “Preparing students to improve humanity.” Graduation requirements include participation in service projects and internships. In order to promote equality, all faculty members start at the same salary and receive raises based on years of service, not on academic rank. Administrators are paid more than faculty but the difference in compensation is significantly less than at other institutions. Power is shared as well. Administrators consult faculty on all major initiatives and policy changes. Five years ago, Ferryport faced a crisis. Prospective students didn’t seem as interested in social justice; enrollment dropped from 1,500 to 1,100 students. Ferryport lacked a significant endowment fund to make up the loss in tuition revenue in part because its alumni, who gravitate toward low-paying, nonprofit positions, had little money to donate to their alma mater. Major business donors were turned off by Ferryport’s support for unions, a raise in the minimum wage, and more government regulation of corporations. Nervous bankers demanded that Ferryport increase its financial reserves from $1 million to $2 million in order to guarantee future loans. In response to the crisis, the school’s board of directors encouraged the president to retire and appointed Gavin Hughes in his place. Hughes had a doctorate in higher education but came to Ferryport from an educational software company. He immediately hired a marketing director who launched a new admissions campaign that highlighted Ferryport’s successful sports teams, beautiful campus, and international trips but made no mention of the college’s mission or service requirements. In another significant move, he hired a chief financial officer (CFO) from an accounting firm and gave him authority to veto spending, even on academic programs. Hughes then recruited a group of local corporate executives to serve as an informal advisory board to help him operate the college in a “business-like manner.” He also increased the number of business people on the Board of Trustees. President Hughes’ moves paid off. The new admissions campaign restored enrollments and the CFO reined in spending. Donations from the local business community increased dramatically, funding the university’s reserves, paying for the construction of a badly needed dining hall and sports complex, and increasing the school’s endowment. The board of trustees was impressed by the turnaround and granted Hughes and his vice presidents substantial raises. At the same time, the board, at the urging of the president and CFO, decided to delay salary increases for staff and faculty for another year in order to ensure a balanced budget. Faculty, while grateful for the college’s financial stability, expressed concern about the new direction of the school. They could earn substantially more at other colleges and universities but were attracted by Ferryport’s social outreach. They worried that the unique culture of Ferryport was being lost in the push to make the college operate like a business. Some complained that money, not mission, now drove the college. Marketing seemed to take priority over the college’s traditional values. The president, who was quick to claim personal credit for the college’s success, appeared to be consolidating power in his administration, reducing the voice of faculty. Others resented the fact that those from nonacademic backgrounds were making important decisions about academic programs. Tensions came to a head when President Hughes proposed a new mission statement for Ferryport: “Preparing tomorrow’s successful new leaders.” No mention was made of social concern, and faculty worried that success meant preparing students for lucrative careers rather than preparing them to serve others. At the same time, Hughes proposed a new faculty evaluation system designed to reward high performers. No longer would faculty operate on the same salary scale. Instead, they would be rated on such factors as publications, teaching evaluations, and use of technology in the classroom. Under this pay-for-performance system, raises would depend on how faculty members were rated by administrators. Upset by the changes, faculty debated whether or not to issue a no-confidence vote in the president. Such a vote is not legally binding; the board of trustees can ignore it. However, President Hughes would find it hard to continue in his position if faculty publicly united in opposition to his leadership. Discussion Probes Is Hughes a transformational or pseudo-transformational leader?Was it ethical to downplay the college’s mission in order to attract more students?Should colleges operate more like businesses?By recruiting business donors, did Hughes sell out the vision and values of the school?Should Ferryport change its vision statement? Why or why not?Is there any way to ensure Ferryport’s financial future without further altering its culture? If so, how?If you were a faculty member, would you support a no-confidence vote? If you were on the board of trustees, how would you respond to such a vote?”

Order NOW For A 10% Discount!
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

Customer Support 24/7

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.


Essay Writing Services

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.


Admission and Business Papers

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.


Editing and Proofreading

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.


Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.