Objective of Legislation

A) Short Answers (Choose 3) 10 Marks EachYou may only choose one question from each sectionGeneral Questioni) “Regarding the ‘objective’ of legislation, the rule is: the more abstract or general the legislative goal, the more desirable the objective ought to be. ” Explain this statement and provide two examples (from the second term) where the SCC ruled that while the objectives of the law remain reasonable the scope of the law must be narrowed to achieve those objectives. Provide for a brief summary for the Court’s reasoning in both cases.Expression/Religioni) “Freedom of Expression is vital to the pursuit of truth and the health of a democratic society. When the government creates law that limits expression it must justify itself to the highest standard of proof that the limitation is a necessary one.” In your own words, elaborate on the meaning of this quote. Given the cases regarding Expression that we have covered in class, how has the Canadian government justified its laws that limit that Charter Right?ii) According to The Supreme Court of Canada, ‘The Harm Principle’ does not limit what constitutes protected Expression or Relgious belief. Explain.Fundamental Justicei) Identify three of the ‘principles of fundamnetal justice’ that the SCC has read into S.7. Why did the SCC not include ‘harm’ in its interpretation of the principles of ‘fundamnetal justice?’ii) The SCC have accepted ‘exterme intoxication’ as a defence in certain circumstances. What are those circumstances? When would ‘EI’ not be permitted as a defence? In your opinion, should extreme intoxication be a defence at all?iii) Parks and Stone are both leading Supreme Court of Canada decisions on the criminal automatism defence. These decisions seem to provide different directions for lower courts when considering evidence regarding automatism. Since Stone doesn’t explicitly overrule Parks, the lower courts can draw distinctions when utilizing one over the other.Briefly describe the distinctions between the Parks and Stone decisions (you do not need to go into any detail regarding the trial facts of either case, just the determinations of law specific to the defence of automatism.) In your opinin, are these decsions consistent with one another? Or has the SCC set a dangerous precendent that may come at the expense of public safety?Equality Rightsi) Identify the criteria that the Supreme Court uses when it decides whether or not to recoginzie a claim of discrimination. In your estimation, what was the key case whereby the SCC articulated an operative definition of discrimination?ii) “When it comes to claims of discrimination, ‘subjective standards’ are not enough. For the SCC the effect of the law has an impact on practices that involve people other than just the party claiming disadvantage.” Explain and provide an exampleWeb Resources:Supreme Court of Canada homepage:https://www.scc-csc.ca/home-accueil/index-eng.aspxReportedDecisions of the Supreme Court 1983 to Present:https://decisions.scc-csc.ca/scc-csc/en/d/s/index.doCanadian Legal information Institute (a search engine for reported court cases in all Canadian jurisdictions).https://www.canlii.org/en/Court Cases:Freedom of Religion:R. v. Big Drug Mart (1985)R. v. Edwards Books and Arts (1986)Multani v. Commission Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys (2006)Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem (2004)Freedom of Expression:R. v. Zundel (1992)R. v. Keegstra (1990) R. v. Butler (1992)R. v. Sharpe (2001)Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (2000)Freedom of Association:Dummore v. Ontario (2001)Delisle v. Canada (1999)Lavigne v. Ontario Public Service Employees Union (1991)Fundamental Justice:Morgentaler v. The Queen (1989)Sing v. Minister of Employment and Immigration (1985)Chaoulli v. Quebec (2005)Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General, 2002).Reference re. B.C. Motor Vehicle Act (1985)Equality Rights:Andrews v. Law Society of B.C. (1989)Vriend v. Alberta, [1989]Egan et al. v. The Queen, (1995)Aboriginal Rights:R. v. Sparrow (1990)Delgamuukw v. British Columbia (1997) R. v. Marshall (1999)Mikisew Cree First Nation v.Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage, 2005)B) Essay Question/Critical Case Analysis: 20 marksThroughout the term we have examined how the courts (via the Charter) have attempted to balance the goals of public policy with the rights and freedoms entrenched in the Charter. In doing so, we have also agreed that the law is not a mechanical exercise or a fail-safe analytical tool when it comes to addressing problematic social and moral issues. The law is, to a large degree, political. That means that decisions, legally principled, logical coherent or otherwise, will always be influenced by contextual factors.Given the cases we have examined this term, it seems then that the tension between the objectives of law, politics and morality will never be completely solved. Perhaps this is a desirable aspect of law in relation to complex social/moral issues.Discuss and evaluated the above quote by making reference to at least one case that involved the tension between morality, the public good, and/or the harm principle and a particular right. In your opinion did the courts strike the correct balance in this cases? Provide reasons for your position(s.)ESSAYQUESTION BASEDON Freedom of Religion:R. v. Big Drug Mart (1985)

Myhomeworkwritings
Order NOW For A 10% Discount!
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

Customer Support 24/7

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Coursework

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.